Artboard 21Artboard 23Artboard 24Artboard 25Artboard 1 copyArtboard 1 copy 2Artboard 4Artboard 10Artboard 6Artboard 7Artboard 12Artboard 13Artboard 14Artboard 17Artboard 16Artboard 18

Determine whole of life costs. Identify optimum replacement ages. Compare alternatives.

A life cycle costing analysis determines the "whole of life" cost of asset ownership from “cradle to grave”, taking into account design, purchase, installation, commissioning, operations, maintenance and disposal. The whole of life cost is an important aspect in alternative scenario comparisons, where lowest life cost is a key target. Optimum replacement ages for major assets can also be determined on the basis of a whole of life ownership cost projection.

 

Are you experiencing any of these problems?

  • Unknown optimum replacement ages for key assets
  • Major asset selection is subjective, with whole of life cost not considered appropriately

ARMS Reliability generate whole of life cost models for major assets, using our detailed equipment characteristics and maintenance cost forecasts as a base.  The whole of life cost models have been used to ascertain the optimum replacement age of major assets or to determine the optimum investment alternative from a range of competing options.

How ARMS Reliability Helps

listing graphic

Optimum asset replacement age

The optimum replacement age of an asset is an important element in the asset strategy and one that should form part of the long term financial planning. Determining the optimum replacement age is dependent on several key factors including performance, degradation, costs, effectiveness and obsolescence.

listing graphic

Base major asset selection on whole of life cost

When considering several alternatives for major asset selection a whole of life asset model supports selection of the asset that will deliver the best performance at the best cost.

Questions? We'll put you on the right path.

Ask about our Life Cycle Costing services and relevant supporting technical solutions. We are ready to help.

Contact Us

We selected ARMS Reliability because of their proven track record in RAM modelling, and their experience in working on green-field sites like the Gruyere Gold Project. Undergoing a RAMS study will ensure that this project delivers the most value to our stakeholders. By getting in early and conducting these maintenance studies now, we will save money and resources down the track by ensuring optimum performance of the plant from the outset. When we hit the 'go live' button, all maintenance costs and schedules will be well defined- We don't want any surprises

Brett Foster - Manager Processing
Gruyere Joint Venture